<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keeping Score</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2008/12/05/keeping-score/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2008/12/05/keeping-score/</link>
	<description>Encouragement, Education &#38; Advocacy for Bicycling in the Real World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:48:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve A</title>
		<link>http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2008/12/05/keeping-score/comment-page-1/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/?p=1704#comment-933</guid>
		<description>In my book, while we HAVE FTR law, let&#039;s load it down with every conceivable exception until the ludicrous premise becomes clear.

I think Keri and I don&#039;t differ at all in desirable end state, nor that the discrimatory premise is the root of the FTR problems. We differ in that I figure each added exception, based on simple obvious facts, strengthen cyclists rights to the road. Most places, a wholesale repeal of FTR is not in the cards anytime soon. As Forester points out, things are going in the opposite direction with the CIC mindset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my book, while we HAVE FTR law, let&#8217;s load it down with every conceivable exception until the ludicrous premise becomes clear.</p>
<p>I think Keri and I don&#8217;t differ at all in desirable end state, nor that the discrimatory premise is the root of the FTR problems. We differ in that I figure each added exception, based on simple obvious facts, strengthen cyclists rights to the road. Most places, a wholesale repeal of FTR is not in the cards anytime soon. As Forester points out, things are going in the opposite direction with the CIC mindset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keri</title>
		<link>http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2008/12/05/keeping-score/comment-page-1/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>Keri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/?p=1704#comment-932</guid>
		<description>Steve said: &lt;em&gt;I really wish Forester had swallowed his irritation and listed ALL the exception for those goombahs!&lt;/em&gt;

The main problem with the FTR law isn&#039;t the lack of exceptions, it&#039;s the discriminatory premise. We could add another half-dozen exceptions and it would still be interpreted as &quot;cyclists must operate on a far right sliver of roadway.&quot; That&#039;s why we ultimately have to fight in our respective states to get rid of it. 

Lane-sharing behavior to facilitate passing should only be initiated by the cyclist at the cyclist&#039;s discretion. It is a courtesy which the individual cyclist alone must balance with his safety and right to travel on the public roads. That this courtesy is codified into law as a primary obligation with some exceptions makes us unequal road users—second-class interlopers—in the eyes of the public and many in law enforcement and the judicial system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve said: <em>I really wish Forester had swallowed his irritation and listed ALL the exception for those goombahs!</em></p>
<p>The main problem with the FTR law isn&#8217;t the lack of exceptions, it&#8217;s the discriminatory premise. We could add another half-dozen exceptions and it would still be interpreted as &#8220;cyclists must operate on a far right sliver of roadway.&#8221; That&#8217;s why we ultimately have to fight in our respective states to get rid of it. </p>
<p>Lane-sharing behavior to facilitate passing should only be initiated by the cyclist at the cyclist&#8217;s discretion. It is a courtesy which the individual cyclist alone must balance with his safety and right to travel on the public roads. That this courtesy is codified into law as a primary obligation with some exceptions makes us unequal road users—second-class interlopers—in the eyes of the public and many in law enforcement and the judicial system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keri</title>
		<link>http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2008/12/05/keeping-score/comment-page-1/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Keri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/?p=1704#comment-931</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a video still of me on Corrine:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/corrine.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;alignnone size-full wp-image-2083&quot; title=&quot;corrine&quot; src=&quot;http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/corrine.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;400&quot; height=&quot;232&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

This is one of 2 spots on my commute where there is a pattern of &quot;mean&quot; behavior (that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s frequent, just that it&#039;s more likely to happen here). I noted the straddle passes because they followed the passive-aggressive MO of using part of my lane and accelerating while the left lane is entirely clear. It&#039;s sometimes accompanied by honking and occasionally a close pass. A few moths ago a guy buzzed me then swerved into the lane in front of me... I regarded it as a temper tantrum and pretended not to notice. I had another one begin honking when he was 1/4 mile away and lay on the horn all the way past (as he passed easily). The empty parking lane is what makes this a pattern spot because our culture believes bicyclists belong to the right of a white line. Note: I typically ride this road in light traffic and the small platoons always have a long time to change lanes before reaching me. The ugliness is 100% a social/cultural problem, it has nothing to do with delay.

Anyway, I didn&#039;t put them in the &quot;mean&quot; category because they didn&#039;t get very close and there was no honking or other indication of a temper tantrum.

My mean ones were:

The guy with the trailer who honked and passed into oncoming traffic on a road with a 25mph speed limit and speed humps he couldn&#039;t go over at more than 20mph. He put a lot of other people at risk for no gain because he was a dick.

And the guy who screamed at me in the 1/100th of a second between the light turning green and my bike moving, then screamed at me to get on the sidewalk &lt;em&gt;after he caught up to me&lt;/em&gt; as I was making a right turn. Funny thing about it was 1 1/2 miles before, the motorist in front of me in the queue was daydreaming and almost caused me to miss the light.

Not included in my list:

On a group ride in the country last weekend, one member of our group was assaulted by a redneck in a duely and we were yelled at to get off the road by 3 &lt;em&gt;opposite-direction&lt;/em&gt; motorists (one yell was so loud and full of anger and hate, I was grateful we were pulling into Yalaha to get lunch). Yet, we were passed courteously by probably a couple hundred motorists. I mention it because I think it speaks to why recreational riders are more sensitive to hostility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a video still of me on Corrine:<br />
<a href="http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/corrine.jpg" rel="nofollow"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2083" title="corrine" src="http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/corrine.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="232" /></a></p>
<p>This is one of 2 spots on my commute where there is a pattern of &#8220;mean&#8221; behavior (that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s frequent, just that it&#8217;s more likely to happen here). I noted the straddle passes because they followed the passive-aggressive MO of using part of my lane and accelerating while the left lane is entirely clear. It&#8217;s sometimes accompanied by honking and occasionally a close pass. A few moths ago a guy buzzed me then swerved into the lane in front of me&#8230; I regarded it as a temper tantrum and pretended not to notice. I had another one begin honking when he was 1/4 mile away and lay on the horn all the way past (as he passed easily). The empty parking lane is what makes this a pattern spot because our culture believes bicyclists belong to the right of a white line. Note: I typically ride this road in light traffic and the small platoons always have a long time to change lanes before reaching me. The ugliness is 100% a social/cultural problem, it has nothing to do with delay.</p>
<p>Anyway, I didn&#8217;t put them in the &#8220;mean&#8221; category because they didn&#8217;t get very close and there was no honking or other indication of a temper tantrum.</p>
<p>My mean ones were:</p>
<p>The guy with the trailer who honked and passed into oncoming traffic on a road with a 25mph speed limit and speed humps he couldn&#8217;t go over at more than 20mph. He put a lot of other people at risk for no gain because he was a dick.</p>
<p>And the guy who screamed at me in the 1/100th of a second between the light turning green and my bike moving, then screamed at me to get on the sidewalk <em>after he caught up to me</em> as I was making a right turn. Funny thing about it was 1 1/2 miles before, the motorist in front of me in the queue was daydreaming and almost caused me to miss the light.</p>
<p>Not included in my list:</p>
<p>On a group ride in the country last weekend, one member of our group was assaulted by a redneck in a duely and we were yelled at to get off the road by 3 <em>opposite-direction</em> motorists (one yell was so loud and full of anger and hate, I was grateful we were pulling into Yalaha to get lunch). Yet, we were passed courteously by probably a couple hundred motorists. I mention it because I think it speaks to why recreational riders are more sensitive to hostility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve A</title>
		<link>http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2008/12/05/keeping-score/comment-page-1/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/?p=1704#comment-930</guid>
		<description>Fred, I agree that technically you&#039;re correct. However, I have no doubt I&#039;d probably have been convicted anyway (after a spirited defense) if ticketed. I also have no doubt that being to the left is the safest and most courteous place to be in this case, regardless of whether or not the lane is wide or narrow. Even a narrow lane is easily shareable in this case since the car is only inching forward.

Actually, in the case in question, I was already far enough to the left that the cop could have safely moved to make his free RH turn on my right. I did the waddle thing mainly to remove any doubt about it in his mind and so he&#039;d know I was expecting that he&#039;d do it if he was so inclined. It&#039;s probably pretty difficult to waddle in your Velocar, but I like to do it for courtesy purposes, and because it leaves all the motorists who see it with a small &quot;plus&quot; in their minds about cyclists that work AS traffic. I hope that it connects a dot for them about WHY I was sitting there at the left of a lane.

For the RH turn lane story as it affects cyclists - for those unfamiliar with it, read pages 284-289 of EFFECTIVE CYCLING. I really wish Forester had swallowed his irritation and listed ALL the exception for those goombahs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred, I agree that technically you&#8217;re correct. However, I have no doubt I&#8217;d probably have been convicted anyway (after a spirited defense) if ticketed. I also have no doubt that being to the left is the safest and most courteous place to be in this case, regardless of whether or not the lane is wide or narrow. Even a narrow lane is easily shareable in this case since the car is only inching forward.</p>
<p>Actually, in the case in question, I was already far enough to the left that the cop could have safely moved to make his free RH turn on my right. I did the waddle thing mainly to remove any doubt about it in his mind and so he&#8217;d know I was expecting that he&#8217;d do it if he was so inclined. It&#8217;s probably pretty difficult to waddle in your Velocar, but I like to do it for courtesy purposes, and because it leaves all the motorists who see it with a small &#8220;plus&#8221; in their minds about cyclists that work AS traffic. I hope that it connects a dot for them about WHY I was sitting there at the left of a lane.</p>
<p>For the RH turn lane story as it affects cyclists &#8211; for those unfamiliar with it, read pages 284-289 of EFFECTIVE CYCLING. I really wish Forester had swallowed his irritation and listed ALL the exception for those goombahs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred_dot_u</title>
		<link>http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2008/12/05/keeping-score/comment-page-1/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>fred_dot_u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/?p=1704#comment-929</guid>
		<description>SteveA, if you&#039;re stopped at a light and move to the left to allow right turning traffic to do so, after stopping at the red light, I do not believe that you violated any traffic law. I do this sort of thing often, when traffic behind me is using turn signals properly, anyway.  If the lane is 14 feet wide or wider at the intersection, you are as far to the right as practicable, because practicable in this case means providing allowance for right turning traffic. If the lane is not 14 feet wide, you can use any portion of it and remain within the FL statutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SteveA, if you&#8217;re stopped at a light and move to the left to allow right turning traffic to do so, after stopping at the red light, I do not believe that you violated any traffic law. I do this sort of thing often, when traffic behind me is using turn signals properly, anyway.  If the lane is 14 feet wide or wider at the intersection, you are as far to the right as practicable, because practicable in this case means providing allowance for right turning traffic. If the lane is not 14 feet wide, you can use any portion of it and remain within the FL statutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve A</title>
		<link>http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2008/12/05/keeping-score/comment-page-1/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/?p=1704#comment-927</guid>
		<description>RH Cyclist Rule Redux - earlier, on the same trip home, on the same service road, I was stopped on the LH side of the RH lane at an intersection (lane option was straight or RH turn). Up beside me, on my right, pulls one of our local policemen. I waddled the bike further left to the extreme LH edge of the lane &amp; waved to him so he knew he could safely make his intended free RH turn.

Per the letter of the law, I could have gotten a ticket instead of the wave I received from the cop. It&#039;s a law that needs to be changed. In the meantime, the cop almost got a &quot;nice&quot; tick mark for not enforcing a law that, in this case, slows traffic and creates unnecessary crossing movements. Forester should have ignored his irritation and listed the &quot;cyclist doesn&#039;t need to stay to the right when traffic has to turn right&quot; exception when they were making up the current rules. AND KERI, you ought to TELL him that on Chainguard.

Maybe the cop didn&#039;t ticket me because it didn&#039;t occur to him to ticket a &quot;nice&quot; cyclist, maybe he just didn&#039;t realize he was letting an outlaw proceed unpunished, or maybe he just had bigger fist to fry. I prefer to think he was using common sense &amp; good judgment. Either way, I wasn&#039;t about to ask why he wasn&#039;t ticketing someone breaking the law less than five feet from him...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RH Cyclist Rule Redux &#8211; earlier, on the same trip home, on the same service road, I was stopped on the LH side of the RH lane at an intersection (lane option was straight or RH turn). Up beside me, on my right, pulls one of our local policemen. I waddled the bike further left to the extreme LH edge of the lane &amp; waved to him so he knew he could safely make his intended free RH turn.</p>
<p>Per the letter of the law, I could have gotten a ticket instead of the wave I received from the cop. It&#8217;s a law that needs to be changed. In the meantime, the cop almost got a &#8220;nice&#8221; tick mark for not enforcing a law that, in this case, slows traffic and creates unnecessary crossing movements. Forester should have ignored his irritation and listed the &#8220;cyclist doesn&#8217;t need to stay to the right when traffic has to turn right&#8221; exception when they were making up the current rules. AND KERI, you ought to TELL him that on Chainguard.</p>
<p>Maybe the cop didn&#8217;t ticket me because it didn&#8217;t occur to him to ticket a &#8220;nice&#8221; cyclist, maybe he just didn&#8217;t realize he was letting an outlaw proceed unpunished, or maybe he just had bigger fist to fry. I prefer to think he was using common sense &amp; good judgment. Either way, I wasn&#8217;t about to ask why he wasn&#8217;t ticketing someone breaking the law less than five feet from him&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve A</title>
		<link>http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2008/12/05/keeping-score/comment-page-1/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/?p=1704#comment-926</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t put a straddle pass into the &quot;mean&quot; category unless it rose above the &quot;clueless&quot; category. Most close passes seem to be a case of motorist misjudgment rather than evil intent. A deliberate close pass, on the other hand, is MUCH scarier and it&#039;s clearly meant as &quot;mean.&quot; In my book, the real reason for further left lane positioning when the lane isn&#039;t easily shareable is to help the motorist conclude early that he/she ought to move over to pass. That decision keeps the passing motorist (and me) safer since he/she makes her move when it&#039;s safe to do so.

That being said, I had an experience that some MIGHT have construed as either &quot;nice&quot; OR &quot;mean&quot; today (initially I thought of it as mean), but upon reflection, I decided not to count it as either. I was on a freeway service road with four lanes. #1 was U turn only. #2 was LH turn only. #3 was left or straight. #4 was RH only. I was on the RH side of #3 since I wanted to go straight through the intersection. A lady in a &quot;cute ute&quot; in #4 honked at me as she pulled up past me. After I thought about it, I concluded she was playing it safe since, for all she knew, I might suddenly swerve right in front of her and so she honked to reduce her (and my) risk. Had she been &quot;mean,&quot; it would have involved repeated honking &amp; maybe a little yelling at me through the window. Had she been &quot;nice,&quot; it would have been a shorter honk - just a &quot;letting you know somebody&#039;s passing you on your right in case you&#039;re one of those FLAKY cyclists.&quot; It isn&#039;t only cyclists that get nervous about passing on the right.

This &quot;nice&quot; versus &quot;mean&quot; stuff isn&#039;t as simple as it sounds!

Courtesy is more common than most of us imagine it to be. That Winter Park truck was simply acting courteously as part of a cyclist-motorist negotiation with you. Still, I&#039;d count it as &quot;nice&quot; since it was a professional driver and aborted an intended maneuver to help you out. I&#039;ll bet the Winter Park truck driver felt good after doing that, so you inadvertently let a little sunshine into somebody&#039;s life.

One last item. My wife told me yesterday about her observation of a cyclist who spilled a load of groceries on the road. A truck driver stopped behind the cyclist to block traffic while he collected the load. Both principal parties KNEW the other&#039;s intent and both left feeling better about the world. Sometimes, cycling gives us hope for the whole human race...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t put a straddle pass into the &#8220;mean&#8221; category unless it rose above the &#8220;clueless&#8221; category. Most close passes seem to be a case of motorist misjudgment rather than evil intent. A deliberate close pass, on the other hand, is MUCH scarier and it&#8217;s clearly meant as &#8220;mean.&#8221; In my book, the real reason for further left lane positioning when the lane isn&#8217;t easily shareable is to help the motorist conclude early that he/she ought to move over to pass. That decision keeps the passing motorist (and me) safer since he/she makes her move when it&#8217;s safe to do so.</p>
<p>That being said, I had an experience that some MIGHT have construed as either &#8220;nice&#8221; OR &#8220;mean&#8221; today (initially I thought of it as mean), but upon reflection, I decided not to count it as either. I was on a freeway service road with four lanes. #1 was U turn only. #2 was LH turn only. #3 was left or straight. #4 was RH only. I was on the RH side of #3 since I wanted to go straight through the intersection. A lady in a &#8220;cute ute&#8221; in #4 honked at me as she pulled up past me. After I thought about it, I concluded she was playing it safe since, for all she knew, I might suddenly swerve right in front of her and so she honked to reduce her (and my) risk. Had she been &#8220;mean,&#8221; it would have involved repeated honking &amp; maybe a little yelling at me through the window. Had she been &#8220;nice,&#8221; it would have been a shorter honk &#8211; just a &#8220;letting you know somebody&#8217;s passing you on your right in case you&#8217;re one of those FLAKY cyclists.&#8221; It isn&#8217;t only cyclists that get nervous about passing on the right.</p>
<p>This &#8220;nice&#8221; versus &#8220;mean&#8221; stuff isn&#8217;t as simple as it sounds!</p>
<p>Courtesy is more common than most of us imagine it to be. That Winter Park truck was simply acting courteously as part of a cyclist-motorist negotiation with you. Still, I&#8217;d count it as &#8220;nice&#8221; since it was a professional driver and aborted an intended maneuver to help you out. I&#8217;ll bet the Winter Park truck driver felt good after doing that, so you inadvertently let a little sunshine into somebody&#8217;s life.</p>
<p>One last item. My wife told me yesterday about her observation of a cyclist who spilled a load of groceries on the road. A truck driver stopped behind the cyclist to block traffic while he collected the load. Both principal parties KNEW the other&#8217;s intent and both left feeling better about the world. Sometimes, cycling gives us hope for the whole human race&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keri</title>
		<link>http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2008/12/05/keeping-score/comment-page-1/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Keri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/?p=1704#comment-921</guid>
		<description>Steve: Your tally of meanies since the post is better than mine. I&#039;ve had 2 mean ones on the commute (not including a few aggressive straddle-passes on Corrine, those were borderline). Otherwise the majority of motorists were courteous (more than I can count were &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; courteous). One that stood out as a &quot;nice&quot; one was a City of Winter Park truck driver who aborted a pass on my request so I could move from the right half to the left half of the lane to avoid bad pavement. In general, I find that most motorists are receptive to merge requests.

Oddly, on a Saturday trip to downtown Winter Park I was passed too close on Palmer by at least 4 motorists, despite a lane position which usually works well on that road... and the sharrows. It&#039;s not helpful when oncoming motorists move far right to give them enough room for a squeeze-through straddle-pass. I&#039;ve noticed several times Saturday drivers are more aggressive and less courteous than what I experience on the weekdays. Wonder what that&#039;s about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve: Your tally of meanies since the post is better than mine. I&#8217;ve had 2 mean ones on the commute (not including a few aggressive straddle-passes on Corrine, those were borderline). Otherwise the majority of motorists were courteous (more than I can count were <em>very</em> courteous). One that stood out as a &#8220;nice&#8221; one was a City of Winter Park truck driver who aborted a pass on my request so I could move from the right half to the left half of the lane to avoid bad pavement. In general, I find that most motorists are receptive to merge requests.</p>
<p>Oddly, on a Saturday trip to downtown Winter Park I was passed too close on Palmer by at least 4 motorists, despite a lane position which usually works well on that road&#8230; and the sharrows. It&#8217;s not helpful when oncoming motorists move far right to give them enough room for a squeeze-through straddle-pass. I&#8217;ve noticed several times Saturday drivers are more aggressive and less courteous than what I experience on the weekdays. Wonder what that&#8217;s about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve A</title>
		<link>http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2008/12/05/keeping-score/comment-page-1/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/?p=1704#comment-910</guid>
		<description>About that blue pickup - I contributed to the second pass after I caught up to it at a stoplight. That experience is why I now practice my line of &quot;let&#039;s go together and talk to the police about it.&quot; As it was, I asked &quot;what did you yell&quot; &amp; then responded with an expletive when they told me they&#039;d yelled to get on the sidewalk. Lesson learned...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About that blue pickup &#8211; I contributed to the second pass after I caught up to it at a stoplight. That experience is why I now practice my line of &#8220;let&#8217;s go together and talk to the police about it.&#8221; As it was, I asked &#8220;what did you yell&#8221; &amp; then responded with an expletive when they told me they&#8217;d yelled to get on the sidewalk. Lesson learned&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve A</title>
		<link>http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/2008/12/05/keeping-score/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commuteorlando.com/wordpress/?p=1704#comment-909</guid>
		<description>OK
Here are my own preliminary results - ONLY including bicycle commutes - no weekend Starbucks or Blockbuster runs included:
Total meaningful interactions per day - about 200. Most of these are around intersections - the passing traffic gathers a lot of attention, but even most of those interactions are near intersections.

Total &quot;mean&quot; percentage since Keri&#039;s post - ZERO which is not a surprise since I have only had two &quot;mean&quot; encounters since I started tracking my bike commutes last May. That&#039;d work out to the ballpark not of 0.1%, but 0.01%. Those two encounters, however, are memorable, particularly the blue pickup truck with &quot;outlaw&quot; on its side that came around for a second pass.

Total &quot;nice&quot; percentage since Keri&#039;s post - about 0.7%. Over half of those occurred since New Year which is surprising. Most of those involved out of turn niceness - the nicest was a lady who offered to let me go ahead at a four way stop &amp; then went when I made it clear I&#039;d rather not jump ahead - I didn&#039;t even have to put my foot down and she made it clear she was going at my invitation so there was no element of the motorist appearing to be nice &amp; then zooming through the intersection. Today&#039;s nice garbage truck driver was also memorable since he&#039;s a professional driver &amp; they tend to follow the rules better than the amateurs.

One OTHER observation: Had I, for the sake of argument, been riding &quot;wrong way,&quot; there would have been a LOT more interactions  since I&#039;d be interacting with every car I was facing and I&#039;d rapidly lose track of just how many cars were coming at me. As it is, I get passed by a lot less cars than I see going in the opposite direction which makes a lot of sense. It&#039;s one more reason that should be mentioned in the litany of why you ought to drive WITH traffic.

Commute is from NE Tarrant County towards Fort Worth. A mix of fairly new suburbs &amp; older ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK<br />
Here are my own preliminary results &#8211; ONLY including bicycle commutes &#8211; no weekend Starbucks or Blockbuster runs included:<br />
Total meaningful interactions per day &#8211; about 200. Most of these are around intersections &#8211; the passing traffic gathers a lot of attention, but even most of those interactions are near intersections.</p>
<p>Total &#8220;mean&#8221; percentage since Keri&#8217;s post &#8211; ZERO which is not a surprise since I have only had two &#8220;mean&#8221; encounters since I started tracking my bike commutes last May. That&#8217;d work out to the ballpark not of 0.1%, but 0.01%. Those two encounters, however, are memorable, particularly the blue pickup truck with &#8220;outlaw&#8221; on its side that came around for a second pass.</p>
<p>Total &#8220;nice&#8221; percentage since Keri&#8217;s post &#8211; about 0.7%. Over half of those occurred since New Year which is surprising. Most of those involved out of turn niceness &#8211; the nicest was a lady who offered to let me go ahead at a four way stop &amp; then went when I made it clear I&#8217;d rather not jump ahead &#8211; I didn&#8217;t even have to put my foot down and she made it clear she was going at my invitation so there was no element of the motorist appearing to be nice &amp; then zooming through the intersection. Today&#8217;s nice garbage truck driver was also memorable since he&#8217;s a professional driver &amp; they tend to follow the rules better than the amateurs.</p>
<p>One OTHER observation: Had I, for the sake of argument, been riding &#8220;wrong way,&#8221; there would have been a LOT more interactions  since I&#8217;d be interacting with every car I was facing and I&#8217;d rapidly lose track of just how many cars were coming at me. As it is, I get passed by a lot less cars than I see going in the opposite direction which makes a lot of sense. It&#8217;s one more reason that should be mentioned in the litany of why you ought to drive WITH traffic.</p>
<p>Commute is from NE Tarrant County towards Fort Worth. A mix of fairly new suburbs &amp; older ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

